28 Weeks Later

2007

Action / Adventure / Drama / Horror / Sci-Fi

166
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 72% · 199 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 66% · 250K ratings
IMDb Rating 6.9/10 10 295952 296K

Top cast

Rose Byrne as Scarlet
Idris Elba as Stone
Imogen Poots as Tammy
Jeremy Renner as Doyle
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
697.66 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
R
23.976 fps
1 hr 40 min
Seeds 41
1.85 GB
1904*1024
English 5.1
R
23.976 fps
1 hr 40 min
Seeds 100+

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by timothyhilditch 6 / 10

True Sequel

A sequel to 28 days later and you don't need to watch it to understand this one. The infection has died off and the UK population has been reduced to a few, being backed by US forces living on the Isle of dogs in London. We follow one family haunted by what they saw in the outbreak, some of these demons return. You rarely see the aftermath of an apocalypse with this interesting premise and conflicted characters it really starts well. But once the inevitable returns so does the usual clichés in this genre.

Reviewed by Tweetienator 7 / 10

Still Waiting for 28 Months Later

Not as strong as 28 Days Later, that's for sure but a rating of 1,2, or 3 for certain is undeserved and no serious rating. Some logic issues, yes, but still better than 90% of the movies published under the banner of the zombie/walker genre. I watched tons, and I know what I am talking about - 28 Weeks Later, good, but could have been much better with a more plausible story and with less ueber-life dramatic action scenes (like that car chase and poisoning gas in the streets).

Reviewed by kosmasp 6 / 10

Later but still not wiser

As far as the action/suspense goes, a 7/10 would have been more appropriately. But as far as the common sense and the plot holes are to be taken into that account/rating, than a 6/10 is still a good rating in my eyes.

Let me explain. Apart from the obvious "let's shake the camera to create some tension/horror", which made me more often nauseous than really scared, quite frankly, the real let downs in this movie are the plot holes and the portrayal of the military. Now I'm not a military guy myself, but to portray them in a manner, that not only makes them look stupid -> SPOILERS: they let the kids get out of the military zone just like that ... oh and how convenient, that they find them exactly at the time when they themselves have found their mother! Not to mention the unguarded mother back at the military zone, where anybody can walk into, to get infected! It's open (mad) house ... enough already! Seriously, this does spoiler a lot of the fun, one can have with the movie ... or could have had, in that case. As for example the introduction in the movie. The guilt ridden father is a great theme, that runs throughout the movie. And the whole beginning is shot in a really great way. But as I said, it doesn't hold up to that unfortunately.

And yes the ending is quite clear ... although still some people try to make sense of it. It doesn't matter (SPOILER again, watch out, don't read if you haven't watched the movie, I'm going to talk about the ending), how the pilot got infected or how the helicopter crashed ... it's just a scheme to set-up a possible "28 months later" (or whatever it will be called)! So Paris, here we come!

Read more IMDb reviews

17 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment